[Phono-L] Capehart
RBaumbach
phonolist at mac.com
Tue Jul 14 14:32:02 PDT 2009
Walt;
I don't know the tracking mass of the various Capehart pickups, but I
expect that Greg Bogantz or Doug Houston do. Capehart changed from a
magnetic to a crystal pickup for the 1937 MY, and these later heads
are lighter.
Bob
On TuesdayJuly 14, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Walt Sommers wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Do you know the approximate tracking mass of the Capehart pick up? I
> am guess it is probably 25 to 40 grams? The RCA Chromium needles
> would be a concern on the 10-50 or other Victor automatics that use
> the #5 acoustic Orthophonic reproducer (tracking at a whopping 130
> grams or so) but assuming that the Capehart's pickup is something
> like 25 to 40 grams I can't imagine the RCA Chromium needles would
> be an issue. I recall reading an RCA patent (which I can't
> specifically call to mind right now) concerning the use of chromium
> on the needles which briefly discussed the issue of the relatively
> low mass of electrical pickups versus the higher mass of the
> acoustic reproducers.
>
> The Victor Soft or Full Tungs~Tone stylus would be ideal for the
> Capehart as well as most of the early electrical pickups. I can't
> say I would recommend the Extra Loud Tungs~Tone stylus simply
> because they are quite aggressive. Others swear by them. Whatever
> you choose, I would stay as far away from jeweled styli (sapphires,
> diamonds, etc.) as possible. Sapphires and diamonds would be great
> if only the designs of the early pickups were better.
>
> I have a feeling I am in Dr. Bogantz's area of expertise
> here...Perhaps he will jump in.
>
> Walt
>
> RBaumbach wrote:
>> Tungstone needles are probably the best choice for either the 10-50
>> or the Capehart, and were recommended by both manufacturers. In
>> the mid-thirties Capehart recommended the RCA Chromium needles, but
>> some collectors feel that these are hard on records. Both the
>> Tungstone and Chromium needles are still rather plentiful. There
>> is a more comprehensive discussion of needles on the bonus page for
>> the Capehart book (see page 5).
>>
>> Contact me privately regarding the owner's manual and schematics.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>> On TuesdayJuly 14, 2009, at 10:11 AM, jimcip at earthlink.net wrote:
>>
>>> After many years, my 1937 Capehart 404G (serial number 10627E) is
>>> now functioning & sounds great & is fun to watch as it changes
>>> records. I have noticed quite a bit of "needle noise" in the
>>> magnetic pickup when the volume is turned down even though the
>>> pickup
>>> has been restored. Is this endemic to a properly performing
>>> Capehart as I suspect because all the doors to the record playing
>>> compartment are sealed with rubber gaskets, presumable to contain
>>> mechanical noise or does the pickup need further work? Also,
>>> where can one obtain needles for playing large numbers of 78s
>>> without being changed in the Capehart or Orthophonic Victrola 1050?
>>> I have Mr. Baumbach's excellent book on the Capeharts without
>>> which the repairman who usually works on 1950s & 1960s hifi gear
>>> would have been completely at sea in working on the Capehart
>>> changer but would like to obtain copies of the owner's manual &
>>> schematics of the tuner & amplifiers.
>>> Jim
>>> Cartwright
>>> Immortal
>>> Performances
>>>
>>>
>>> jimcip at earthlink.net
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Phono-L mailing list
>>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Phono-L mailing list
>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database:
>> 270.13.13/2237 - Release Date: 07/14/09 05:56:00
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
More information about the Phono-L
mailing list