[Phono-L] Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B

[gpaul2000 at aol.com]

 I don't consider either the Amberola III or the 1B to be common machines.? As to which is rarer, I wouldn't hazard a guess...

George Paul


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Nichol <jnichol at fuse.net>
To: Antique Phonograph List <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
Sent: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 3:38 pm
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B










The only question I'm aware of for the Amberola III is why there is  
apparently less interest in them than the Amberola I.  Are they a lot  
more rare?

Jim

On Oct 26, 2008, at 2:24 PM, gpaul2000 at aol.com wrote:

>
> Peter,
>
> I certainly have nothing against Amberola IIIs! It's just that I've  
> been wanting to clear up some early 1909-1911 Amberola questions for  
> a long time, and I'm not getting any younger...
>
> Are there questions surrounding the Amberola III?
>
> Best,
> George Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org