[Phono-L] Victor versus Columbia big guns

Greg Bogantz gbogantz1 at charter.net
Sat Feb 9 12:14:36 PST 2008


Hi Steve,

    Threading the needle shank and having it screw into the needle bar is an 
option.  I hadn't considered that before, but it would pretty well solve the 
extra mass problem.  But it would make the needles pretty involved to 
manufacture.  I'll keep it in mind.

Greg



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Medved" <steve_noreen at msn.com>
To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: [Phono-L] Victor versus Columbia big guns


Hi Greg,

Could you use a threaded needle bar and have the needle thread in?

Steve



> From: gbogantz1 at charter.net> To: phono-l at oldcrank.org> Subject: Re: 
> [Phono-L] Victor versus Columbia big guns> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 
> 18:38:11 -0500> > Hi Steve,> > I have built several of them. Each is a 
> slightly different experimental > version on the basic theme. The best one 
> is very good, but it is still "not > ready for prime time". It remains 
> pretty user-unfriendly, particularly in > that I haven't figgered out yet 
> how to make the needle change easy to do. > The common needle chuck 
> arrangement that is found on nearly all > commercially-made reproducers is 
> a lot of the problem with them. They are > easy to use but they contribute 
> too much moving mass to the system. I'm > still thinkin about how to 
> design a needle mount that is low mass and also > easy to use. Just as in 
> every other area of acoustic reproducer design, > this one presents 
> diametrically opposing requirements. Figgering out the > best compromise 
> is where the challenge is. And the head-scratching.> > Greg Bogantz> > > 
>  > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Medved" 
> <steve_noreen at msn.com>> To: "Antique Phonograph List" 
> <phono-l at oldcrank.org>> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 6:27 PM> Subject: 
> RE: [Phono-L] Victor versus Columbia big guns> > > Hi Greg and list,> > 
> You said:> > My design has a MUCH lower moving mass and quite a lot higher 
> compliance > than any other reproducer that was sold to the public.> > 
> Does this mean you are building them?> > 
> Steve_______________________________________________> Phono-L mailing 
> list> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > 
> _______________________________________________> Phono-L mailing list> 
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org 



More information about the Phono-L mailing list