Just to play devils advocate here. What about the seller who is ripped off by th buyer? If that seller leaves negative FB for the buyer he can be sure that he will receive a negative comment in return. Jim Nichol wrote: > Isn't is obvious? Buyers usually wouldn't leave bad feedback for ripoff > sellers, because they don't want to risk retaliation by the seller. For > that reason, I have never left negative feedback for a seller, even when > he deserved it. I don't want my 100% record to be ruined by his > retaliation. When I get ripped off by a seller, I just don't leave > feedback at all. > > Jim > > On Feb 1, 2008, at 8:55 PM, Albert wrote: > >> wondered about this too. What is Ebays rationale for not allowing >> sellers to leave negative feed back on buyers? can somebody comment? >> Al Menashe >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Boyles" <66pony at cox.net> >> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l at oldcrank.org> >> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 4:40 PM >> Subject: [Phono-L] OT - Ebay rebellion >> >> >>> Looks like there is a big push back on the upcoming Ebay changes...... >>> >>> http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/31/smbusiness/ebay_fee_hike.fsb/index.htm?postversion=2008013116 >>> >>> >>> It appears there is a orchestrated event asking sellers not to list >>> and buyers not to bid during the week of Feb 20-27. It may get >>> interesting...... >>> Eric >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Phono-L mailing list >>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: >>> 269.11.19/955 - Release Date: 8/15/2007 4:55 PM >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Phono-L mailing list >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > >