i have a simpler explanation: - he meant "censorship" - he thought he was addressing phonolist, not phono-L haw. Albert wrote: > Dan: must be those liberal Graphophone collectors. Real Men prefer > Edison. > LOL Al > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Melvin" <dan at old-phonographs.com> > To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l at oldcrank.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 6:44 PM > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] removal from list > > >>I haven't noticed anything odd going on this list. Who was having the >> problem? >> >> Dan >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: <crankemup at comcast.net> >> To: <Phono-L at oldcrank.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 4:01 AM >> Subject: [Phono-L] removal from list >> >> >>> Loran, >>> >>> >>> Please remove me from the list. Censureship belongs elsewhere, not here >>> in >>> America....................... >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Phono-L mailing list >>> Phono-L at oldcrank.org >>> >>> Phono-L Archive >>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/ >>> >>> Support Phono-L >>> http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Phono-L mailing list >> Phono-L at oldcrank.org >> >> Phono-L Archive >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/ >> >> Support Phono-L >> http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > Phono-L at oldcrank.org > > Phono-L Archive > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/ > > Support Phono-L > http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank >