[Phono-L] Which one? And why?

Gpaul2000 at aol.com Gpaul2000 at aol.com
Sun Nov 26 13:25:19 PST 2006


Jerry:
       I'd definitely go for the upside-down decal.  This is only the second 
instance of the anomoly I'm aware of.  (The Vernis-Martin example is in our 
upcoming book, "A World of Antique Phonographs.")  I have a golden oak XVI 
myself, but I'd trade it in a heartbeat for one with an upside-down decal.  What 
gets me is that apparently neither the dealer nor the customer had a problem 
with paying $200 for a Victrola (or $400 in the instance of the Vernis-Martin) 
with its decal inverted!  It seems as though the lid could have been returned to 
Camden for replacement/repair  As far as the oak example is concerned, a good 
refinisher (and I'll bet Victor had plenty of them) could have reworked only 
the single affected interior panel.  Even a complete lid refinish wouldn't 
have been a big deal.  It's quite a mystery...

George Paul



More information about the Phono-L mailing list